More From The ABA Journal

My print copy of the ABA Journal arrived today, and, in addition to the article on Lawyers Who Blawg discussed here, Jason Krause did another great piece on the Web and legal research (Netting Information:
It's Not All We Promised, But the Web Still Has Plenty to Offer). It includes this pithy observation: "Sometimes ambitious (or over-caffeinated) employees take it upon themselves to create a blog, either for the firm's own internal use or as a service accessible to the general public." (I'd add "visionary" to that litany of adjectives, but hey, that's just me.) Steven Cohen's segment goes a long way toward introducing the (ever diminishing) non-blogging segment of the legal profession to the power of RSS:

Cohen is a proponent of RSS feeds, or the Rich Site Summary format [ed.: or as many including Dave Winer put it, Really Simple Syndication]. Most major news sites and a growing number of legal sites have RSS built in, which means that lawyers can sign up to get news from these sites fed to them through free newsreader software that can be installed on any computer.

RSS feeds are available from many major legal Web sites, major news services like CNN and most legal Web logs. Just look on a site for a link or button that says XML.

To use these services, you will need to download a newsreader program. These programs are like a Web browser and e-mail inbox combined. When you launch the program on your computer, it opens a list of articles found on the Web that meet your criteria. Clicking on one of the headlines brings up the article in a browser window.

Some popular newsreader software includes AmphetaDesk, which is free, and NewzCrawler, which has a free trial version and a full version costing $24.95.

"I'm not going to tell lawyers to subscribe to 200 news feeds and try to make sense of it all," says Cohen. "But three to four feeds that pertain to them, specifically fed to one aggregator, ought to be a manageable level of information." [Links added]

Also featured are blawgers Tom Mighell, Rory Perry, Howard Bashman, the SCOTUSblog and Professor Lessig.

Post Spectrum Posts

Donna links to the New York Times coverage of the recent Cal-Stanford conferences: "'Go back to work and clear up this mess for us,' Professor Demsetz said [after judging a moot court on spectrum property/commons issues]. 'And don't take too long to do it because we're losing ground fast.'"

20 Questions, x2

In the second of what has become a monthly feature at How Appealing, Howard Bashman today posted his 20 Questions with Circuit Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. My favorite thing about the interview? The way it begins with a link to Judge O'Scannlain's Federal Judicial Council profile, and then goes on to provide abundantly more textured information about this jurist than could ever be gleaned from the terse official page.

As if that weren't powerful enough: Howard thoughtfully has set up a separate 20 Questions Blog to save you the trouble of keeping the permalinks to, or searching his archives for, these interviews. (Thus illustrating the need for an implementation I feel sure is high on Blogger's agenda: post categories.)

Motivationally Speaking

Whitman L. Holt knows how to get things done, as well as being a Harvard blawger. [via Howard] (See also this post at Jeneane's.)

[Update] Wow, this is really sad. Apparently Mr. Holt has changed his mind. On the off chance he ever drops by here, I would urge him to reconsider. He seemed a sharp, witty fellow with much to say.

A Day The Web Got Better

Congratulations and happy blog birthday to Ernie the Attorney. And what does Ernie do on his blog's first birthday? He gives us gifts with, among other things, this great post sifting Cory Doctorow's notes for what one of the Ninth Circuit's tech-savviest jurists, Alex Kozinski, had to say at the Stanford Spectrum Policy Conference. (Doc made it there today too, and has many insights about the F.M. band.) Good man Ernie, good men all.